I have known for a while now, thanks to Richard C Hoagland, if I have understood him correctly, that NASA indulges in the use of Egyptian Symbolism to hide from the public; the real reason for some of their space missions.
That`s how it seems to me. Mr Hoagland has for over 40-years researched the possibility of a former Ancient-Solar-System-Wide High Tech Civilization. He has also undertaken extensive study of numbers and sacred mythology attached to celestial bodies, all of which you can find on his web site "Enterprise Mission" or listening to him being interviewed on various radio stations.
The reason I`m writing this is because of Mr Hoagland’s encouragement for the wider public to look deeper into everything we are told by NASA or any other organisation or country involved in space travel. The other day I came across a report on the BT news site here in the UK that the European Space Agency had 10-years ago sent a craft across the asteroid belt in order for it to rendezvous with comet 67P/CHURYUMOV-GERASIMENKO.
The craft consisted of the main vehicle called Rosetta which carried a lander named Philae this would be sent down to the comet to collect and analyse samples, while the main craft Rosetta kept pace; very interesting I thought . Next to improve my knowledge I give the craft’s names a little investigation, it was while doing this I stumbled on a piece of what could be numerical symbolism that was fascinating to say the least. I had vague knowledge of the name Rosetta but needed to be sure of its meaning so I thought Wikipedia would be a good place to improve on my knowledge.
To cut a long story short, Rosetta was from the Rosetta Stone. This stone was inscribed with a decree issued in 196 BC. Now Philae is 2-small islands situated in the Nile just above the first cataract near Aswan, on Philae there was an obelisk, well the etchings on this obelisk and those on the Rosetta Stone helped archaeologists understand and read Egyptian Hieroglyphics. So as these 2-stones lead to a greater understanding, likewise it is hoped these spacecraft will result in a better understanding of comets and the early solar system hence the names given (as stated by Wikipedia).
Now this is the interesting bit. Philae (the island) , as stated by Wikipedia, are 100 km or (62 miles) from Aswan.
Next, the orbit of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko was known before Rosetta was launched to an accuracy of, again, 62-miles
And then we are told that the craft arrived at the comet at a distance of, yet again, 62-miles.
Is this a coincidence? Did they, because of the distance of the Philae isles from Aswan, incorporate the number 62 into their project to keep in line with the historical perspective, equally why was comet 67P`s orbit calculated to an accuracy of 62-miles before the launch of Rosetta ?
What is it with the number 62? I cannot, as yet, find any reason or explanation why the number 62 was used.
My curiosity got the better of me so I decided to e-mail Richard C. Hoagland, knowing how busy people like Mr Hoagland are, I was pleased to get a prompt reply, he confirmed that I had indeed discovered additional numerical symbolism connected to the project, and that he would soon be putting out on Enterprise Mission a full analysis of the mission. He also said that the Rosetta mission is filled with recurring Egyptian symbolism especially its choice of target comet,,he also said to expect more surprise`s concerning the true nature of Comet 67P.
From this point on I will leave it to the experts, I keenly await Mr Hoagland analysis report where I hope the number 62 will be explained along with his other revelations about the mission.
UPDATE
The distance Philae was from Aswan, as stated on Wikipedia is 100 km (62-miles). Wikipedia also states that the measurement was made by Groskurd. Now my son informed me that he could not find any other reference to the 62-miles indicated, even, after 5-hours on the internet, he believes someone has changed something.
Puzzled by what he had said I logged into Google Earth, using the "Ruler" icon I drew a line from where Aswan was to the area of Philae. No matter how much I tried, it did not show 62-miles; 62-miles was way past Philae or way into the desert. My son started to play with the numbers and this is what he came up with.
Distance indicated by Wikipedia of 100km (62 mile) between Philae ans Aswan is.... Wrong. So he subtracted 62 from 100 which left 38, he then compounded 38 which was (11). Then he added 100 and 62, which is 162, he then compounded this to (9).
So we end up with the notorious numbers (9/11).
This, you might say, is just playing with numbers, it’s only when you think that they have scheduled Philae to land on comet 67/P on the 11th November 2014 that you start to scratch you head, the 11th day of the 11-month. On the day of Philae`s landing it will be Remembrance Day back here on Earth, which means most will be looking the other way 11:11:11.
I think the number 11 in the Bible means "Chaos".
Is this just accidental or is someone working to ritual?
They are saying that the 67/P as being a Contact Binary, in other words 2-comets have collided and stuck together. I also discovered that some of the images of comet 67P were put out on an internet site The Planetary Society, two guesses as to the date on the images yes you`ve got it, the 11th July 2014. why not the 9th or 10th or the 12th? Also on that site there was a time line of events as Rosetta made contact with comet 67P, at the bottom of the list was the time ESA (European Space Agency) would give a press briefing, yes again, it was listed to take place at 11 o’clock Universal Time or 4am local time. There`s no doubt they love the number 11, but why?
I just find it all strange.
